Skip to content
    Dashboard
    • Login
    • Dashboard
    • Courses
    • Calendar
    • Inbox
    • Help
    Close
    • My dashboard
    • ANTHRO 748
    • Assignments
    • Essay
    2018 Semester One
    • Home
    • Assignments
    • Modules
    • Files
    • Syllabus
    • Reading Lists
    • Cover Sheet
    • SET Evaluations
    • Recordings

    Essay

    • Due 28 Apr 2018 by 9:00
    • Points 40
    • Submitting an external tool
    • Available 26 Feb 2018 at 9:00 - 28 Apr 2018 at 23:59 2 months
    This assignment was locked 28 Apr 2018 at 23:59.

    Your essay topic is to take one method of osteological analysis to do with human identification (e.g.a method of ageing, population affinity, sexing, mobility, etc etc) and explain in plain English the assumptions, the core principles, the limitations of the method and produce on the basis of that a set of guidelines for it use.  This isn’t just a summary of a method but it is a careful exploration of a method (e.g. stature estimation using regression analysis or strontium analysis of mobility) and an evaluation of its limits. The aim is to ensure that you can evaluate and explain methods, weigh them up and assess their usefulness.  This is the sort of thing you need to be able to do both for your further research in any field but also if you have to justify your work in the field for ethics committees, courts, permit granting agencies etc. In undertaking this I suggest that you use a standard form of meta-analysis and we will discuss how to do this and workshop techniques in class.

    1524862800 04/28/2018 09:00am
    Additional comments:
    Rating max score to > Pts

    Rubric

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
         
    Can't change a rubric once you've started using it.  
    Find a rubric
    Find rubric
    Title
    You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
    Title
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    Edit criterion description Delete criterion row
    This criterion is linked to a learning outcome Description of criterion
    view longer description
    threshold: 5 pts
    Edit rating Delete rating
    5 to >0 Pts
    Full marks
    blank
    Edit rating Delete rating
    0 to >0 Pts
    No marks
    blank_2
    This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.
    pts
      / 5 pts
    --
    Additional comments
    Total points: 5 out of 5